Unemployment's 75th Birthday: Is this what FDR had in mind?

This Saturday marks the

75th anniversary of the Social Security Act

, arguably the greatest determinant of labor policy the US will ever see. But as SFR

this week, unemployment (let alone Social Security) doesn't quite work like a well-oiled machine.

And despite New Mexico's

8.2 percent

unemployment

rate

, last weekend,

benefits were reduced

from 99 weeks to 93. Read more after the jump.

---

Let's start with a little bit of background. According to

from the New Mexico Department of Workforce Solutions, New Mexico's seasonally adjusted unemployment rate has been climbing steadily since August 2007. Check it:

That gives us a graph that looks like this:

Not so great, right? But even though our unemployment rate is almost

five percentage points above

where it was in 2007, last week, Workforce Solutions announced that

New Mexico was no longer eligible for Tier IV

, the final six weeks of unemployment insurance for people who have already exhausted 93 weeks' worth. (This happened because our unemployment rate dipped below 8.5%, the Tier IV cutoff. Currently, it's at 8.2%.)

That announcement followed on the heels of Congress'

an extended unemployment benefits program—set to expire in June—through this November.

The bottom line: New Mexico will be able to accommodate more unemployed people, but for shorter time periods.

Unfortunately, that may be the opposite of what we need.

This July, the

(on

of the aisle) freaked out about what the Washington Post's

"the scariest jobs graph you've seen yet." It's the

on

how long it'll take us to return to pre-recession employment levels:

Writes Klein:

That's job growth per month on the X axis, and how many months that level of job growth would take to get us back to pre-recession levels on the Y axis. Notice that

adding new jobs at a rate of 200,000 a month would take us 150 months—or 12.5 years—to get back to normalcy.

So far, only April has seen more than 200,000 in non-census jobs growth—and even then, just barely.

Yeah, and

know what happened to all those census jobs? They ended,

prompting

from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

So what's the takeaway?

New Mexico, and especially Santa Fe, consistently fares better than the national average in the unemployment sphere. But neither are we immune to national trends. And if the

"Great Stagnation" pattern continues,

it'll take the country a long time to get back on its feet.

On a more personal level,

people who are unemployed may stay that way for longer

—but as my Taoseña friend always says, "We've always been poor, so

we're better at it."

You stay classy, Santa Fe.

Drew Lenihan contributed reporting.

Letters to the Editor

Mail letters to PO Box 4910 Santa Fe, NM 87502 or email them to editor[at]sfreporter.com. Letters (no more than 200 words) should refer to specific articles in the Reporter. Letters will be edited for space and clarity.

We also welcome you to follow SFR on social media (on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter) and comment there. You can also email specific staff members from our contact page.